Let me suggest a different context. During the mercantilist period -- yes, during capitalism -- the majority of the economists were very concerned about putting everybody to work; that is, eliminating unemployment. The reason was the people had alternatives to wage labor. Once those alternatives disappear, the threat of unemployment rather than direct coercion become central to disciplining labor. -- Michael Perelman Economics Department California State University Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321 E-Mail michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Another interesting aspect to the particularity of this process. This of course need not obscure the broad correct generalisation that unemployment is not a characteristic feature of pre-capitalist societies.
I am taking the opportunity of correcting the thread title, and removing a few "Re's"
Chris Burford
- [PEN-L:27358] Re: LTV and income disparity, (continued)
- [PEN-L:27358] Re: LTV and income disparity, joanna bujes Fri 28 Jun 2002, 18:18 GMT
- [PEN-L:27364] Re: Re: LTV and income disparity, Joel Blau Fri 28 Jun 2002, 19:40 GMT
- [PEN-L:27393] Re: nemployment before capitalism, Chris Burford Sat 29 Jun 2002, 18:30 GMT
- [PEN-L:27394] Re: Re: nemployment before capitalism, Michael Perelman Sat 29 Jun 2002, 18:41 GMT
- [PEN-L:27396] Re: unemployment before capitalism, Chris Burford Sat 29 Jun 2002, 19:13 GMT
- [PEN-L:27317] the bubble & fraud: blamin' the profs., Ian Murray Fri 28 Jun 2002, 03:09 GMT
- [PEN-L:27319] Re: the bubble & fraud: blamin' the profs., Patrick Bond Fri 28 Jun 2002, 03:57 GMT
- [PEN-L:27316] WCOM: Arrow at heart of economy, Steve Diamond Fri 28 Jun 2002, 03:05 GMT
- [PEN-L:27315] Re: decline and fall of US business model?, Carl Remick Fri 28 Jun 2002, 03:01 GMT