My previous note on this subject was about the existence of substitutes for unemployment under capitalism. But there's also the issue of the existence of unemployment under non-capitalist modes of production.
Unemployment typically doesn't exist under slavery, since the slave-owner
tries to get as much labor as possible out of his or her chattel. It also
doesn't exist under serfdom, since not only does the lord try to get as much
as possible out of the serf, but the serf had enough autonomy (direct access
to the means of production & subsistence) that he or she could use any free
time to produce use-values for the family.
- [PEN-L:27398] Re: RE: Re: Re: nemployment before capitalism, (continued)
- [PEN-L:27398] Re: RE: Re: Re: nemployment before capitalism, Michael Perelman Sat 29 Jun 2002, 20:06 GMT
- [PEN-L:27392] lawyers, Devine, James Sat 29 Jun 2002, 17:33 GMT
- [PEN-L:27391] RE: Re: unemployment and capitalism (II), Devine, James Sat 29 Jun 2002, 17:21 GMT
- [PEN-L:27390] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: most experts agree, Justin Schwartz Sat 29 Jun 2002, 15:50 GMT
- [PEN-L:27389] Re: unemployment and capitalism (II), Justin Schwartz Sat 29 Jun 2002, 15:43 GMT
- [PEN-L:27388] RE: Good analysis of WCOM and Credit Bubble, Devine, James Sat 29 Jun 2002, 15:05 GMT
- [PEN-L:27387] up-scale Maquiladoras?, Devine, James Sat 29 Jun 2002, 14:48 GMT
- [PEN-L:27380] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: most experts agree, Justin Schwartz Sat 29 Jun 2002, 05:11 GMT
- [PEN-L:27382] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: most experts agree, Ian Murray Sat 29 Jun 2002, 06:37 GMT