> James Devine:
> >>Here's what I wrote<<
>
> I can see what you wrote. It is just too time-consuming to
> reply to. I have
> to separate out the paragraphs, etc.
I can't figure this out. I have complained to IS about 5 times now.
> In any case, I agree completely with what Michael Hoover wrote.
strangely, so do I. But he didn't deal with all the issues I did.
JD
- [PEN-L:27374] Re: testing, (continued)
- [PEN-L:27374] Re: testing, Dan Scanlan Fri 28 Jun 2002, 23:50 GMT
- [PEN-L:27362] Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: TV and income disparity, Michael Hoover Fri 28 Jun 2002, 19:07 GMT
- [PEN-L:27361] Memories, joanna bujes Fri 28 Jun 2002, 18:55 GMT
- [PEN-L:27360] (no subject), Michael Hoover Fri 28 Jun 2002, 18:48 GMT
- [PEN-L:27359] RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: TV and inco me disparity, Devine, James Fri 28 Jun 2002, 18:19 GMT
- [PEN-L:27356] RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: TV and income dispa rity, Devine, James Fri 28 Jun 2002, 18:05 GMT
- [PEN-L:27357] Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: TV and income disparity, Louis Proyect Fri 28 Jun 2002, 18:11 GMT
- [PEN-L:27355] Re: Re: Re: LTV, income disparity, and world systems, Waistline2 Fri 28 Jun 2002, 18:03 GMT
- [PEN-L:27354] RE: LTV, income disparity, and world systems, Devine, James Fri 28 Jun 2002, 17:57 GMT