Absolutely false. In England, for example, in the 14th and 15th centuries, vagabondage--landless migrant would-be workers--was a huge social problem. In ancient Rome, there was the proletariat--a term that meant "those whose only function is to breed."
England: Late 14th century there was actually a labor shortage due to plague; 15th century is the birth of the enclosure movement, which enclosed some of the commons, taking away people's means to live: they migrated to the cities, where they were subject to increasingly harsh "poor laws." The situation in Rome was also an outcome of Rome as empire. None of this is to argue that Capitalism was responsible, but to argue that equally artificial conditions of privilege and immiseration obtained.
Joanna
- [PEN-L:27324] East European resistance to privatization, Louis Proyect Fri 28 Jun 2002, 12:20 GMT
- [PEN-L:27321] Re: most experts agree, Tom Walker Fri 28 Jun 2002, 04:37 GMT
- [PEN-L:27320] LTV and income disparity, Justin Schwartz Fri 28 Jun 2002, 04:00 GMT
- [PEN-L:27326] Re: LTV and income disparity, Carrol Cox Fri 28 Jun 2002, 13:21 GMT
- [PEN-L:27358] Re: LTV and income disparity, joanna bujes Fri 28 Jun 2002, 18:18 GMT
- [PEN-L:27364] Re: Re: LTV and income disparity, Joel Blau Fri 28 Jun 2002, 19:40 GMT
- [PEN-L:27393] Re: nemployment before capitalism, Chris Burford Sat 29 Jun 2002, 18:30 GMT
- [PEN-L:27394] Re: Re: nemployment before capitalism, Michael Perelman Sat 29 Jun 2002, 18:41 GMT
- [PEN-L:27396] Re: unemployment before capitalism, Chris Burford Sat 29 Jun 2002, 19:13 GMT