Thanks, Roberto. Perhaps you -- or someone else -- should write a letter to the editors of the New York TIMES (letters@xxxxxxxxxxx)
When you write "My main point is that, whatever the political ideas of the journalist (in this case I would say more rather right wingish), the article is poorly written, for ignorance or on purpose," you capture the essence of Krueger's problem: he's not a journalist but a mainstream (neoclassical) economist. He probably didn't talk to workers or lawyers or labor experts and most likely didn't even talk to employers. Neoclassical economists start with an _a priori_ vision of the world as one of perfect markets that may be a little flawed by "market imperfections" and typically talk only to economists (and typically only respect the opinions of other neoclassical economists). So even a mildly liberal neoclassical such as Kreuger gives us only the conventional wisdom. As they say in the computer biz, "garbage in/garbage out."
Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
- [PEN-L:27306] Timor: Oil and troubled waters, Ulhas Joglekar Fri 28 Jun 2002, 00:43 GMT
- [PEN-L:27314] Re: Timor: Oil and troubled waters, michael perelman Fri 28 Jun 2002, 02:35 GMT
- [PEN-L:27302] RE: RE: Italian labor, Devine, James Fri 28 Jun 2002, 00:11 GMT
- [PEN-L:27301] RE: Italian labor, Sabri Oncu Thu 27 Jun 2002, 23:54 GMT
- [PEN-L:27300] RE: Italian labor, Devine, James Thu 27 Jun 2002, 23:17 GMT
- [PEN-L:27304] Re: RE: Italian labor, Ian Murray Fri 28 Jun 2002, 00:26 GMT
- [PEN-L:27318] Re: Re: RE: Italian labor, Eugene Coyle Fri 28 Jun 2002, 03:35 GMT
- [PEN-L:27328] Re: Re: Re: RE: Italian labor, Carrol Cox Fri 28 Jun 2002, 13:39 GMT
- [PEN-L:27298] Re: decline and fall of US business model?, Sabri Oncu Thu 27 Jun 2002, 22:37 GMT