That's a contradiction in liberalism that's as old as Hobbes and Locke:
invidualism is wonderful, so they say, until it starts undermining the
system that allows individualism to reign. I don't see how the latter
can be avoided forever. Instead, a surge of "too much" individualism
(WorldCom, etc.) leads to a swing back toward collectivism.
BTW, Nancy Folbre's THE INVISIBLE HEART has a useful approach to
individualism dealing with "family" issues.
-- JD
Michael Perelman writes:
John Henry had a more positive review of the book, in that it showed the
contradictory nature of neo-liberal thought. Individualism is
supposedly good, but too much individualism is destructive.
- [PEN-L:27280] Prozac & Productivity, Charles Brown Thu 27 Jun 2002, 15:25 GMT
- [PEN-L:27287] Re: Prozac & Productivity, Carrol Cox Thu 27 Jun 2002, 16:54 GMT
- [PEN-L:27279] Nine million Afghans depend on WFP, Ulhas Joglekar Thu 27 Jun 2002, 15:14 GMT
- [PEN-L:27278] Capitalist thievery inhibits capitalist recovery, Charles Brown Thu 27 Jun 2002, 14:44 GMT
- [PEN-L:27277] Re: Jim Craven review of "Economics as Religion" (from Marxmail), Devine, James Thu 27 Jun 2002, 14:40 GMT
- [PEN-L:27276] RE: Re: Prozac & Productivity, Devine, James Thu 27 Jun 2002, 14:38 GMT
- [PEN-L:27274] Bush at bay, Charles Brown Thu 27 Jun 2002, 13:18 GMT
- [PEN-L:27273] Good Health=Higher Productivity, Hari Kumar Thu 27 Jun 2002, 12:56 GMT
- [PEN-L:27272] Monopoly media miserbelist manic, Charles Brown Thu 27 Jun 2002, 12:31 GMT