PEN-L
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

RE: RE: Estimating Surplus



Title: RE: [PEN-L:26569] RE: Estimating Surplus

Duménil & Lévy, if I remember, split proprietors' income 50/50 between labor & capital incomes. They also provide a variety of different estimates. Which you use would depend on what your purpose is. For studying time series, most of D&L's estimates of the profit rate mostly move together.

Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx &  http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Max Sawicky [mailto:sawicky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 2:06 PM
> To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [PEN-L:26569] RE: Estimating Surplus
>
>
> Part of properietors' income is really a quasi-wage, and part of
> wage & salary at the top is really a quasi-capital payment.
> I would say net interest paid (not personal interest received)
> and rent belong too.
>
> mbs


> > For the NIPA aware.....
> >
> > If you want to come up with a crude estimate for the total
> > surplus generated
> > by capitalist firms within the US economy, is there
> anything particularly
> > wrong with simply summing up various data taken from the
> National Income
> > data in NIPA (table 1.14)?
>



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]