> Doug wrote,
> > Net interest is figured as what biz pays to households, right? It's
> > an expense for business and an income for households.
Eric wrote:
> Yes indeed that is the case. I guess such a number doesn't
> add to capitalist
> surplus.
why not? aren't there capitalist households?
JD
- RE: RE: RE: RE: Estimating Surplus, (continued)
- RE: RE: RE: RE: Estimating Surplus, Eric Nilsson Tue 04 Jun 2002, 22:19 GMT
- Surplus mysterious chatacter, miychi Wed 05 Jun 2002, 09:55 GMT
- RE: Estimating Surplus, Sabri Oncu Wed 05 Jun 2002, 00:01 GMT
- Re: RE: Estimating Surplus, ravi Wed 05 Jun 2002, 19:09 GMT
- RE: RE: Re: RE: RE: Estimating Surplus, Devine, James Wed 05 Jun 2002, 00:30 GMT
- RE: RE: Estimating Surplus, Devine, James Wed 05 Jun 2002, 00:32 GMT
- Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: RE: Estimating Surplus, enilsson Wed 05 Jun 2002, 03:35 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: RE: Estimating Surplus, Doug Henwood Wed 05 Jun 2002, 13:14 GMT
- RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: RE: Estimating Surplus, Eric Nilsson Wed 05 Jun 2002, 17:24 GMT