contrary to what it says below, Michael did not write the two paragraphs. I did. It's good to see that pen-l is receiving my missives even I am not receiving yours... JD
Michael Perelman wrote:
it's interesting (to me, at least), that the "ideal" market of neoclassical economics -- the perfectly competitive market -- does not allow diversity; diversity undermines perfection. On the other hand, the more realistic story of atomistic markets that neoclassical economics typically plays down -- the monopolistically competitive market -- is the one that assumes diversity, at least in terms of the product being sold.
Actually, all I'm doing is testing to see if my e-mail system will send. It ain't receiving. And I see pen-l as an all-important antidote to jury duty. I'm on a "ten day trial." I have two words about that: personal injury.
JD
- Re: Re: : Markets and Diversity, (continued)
- Re: Re: : Markets and Diversity, Michael Perelman Mon 03 Jun 2002, 16:31 GMT
- RE: Re: Re: : Markets and Diversity, Eric Nilsson Mon 03 Jun 2002, 16:39 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: : Markets and Diversity, Doug Henwood Mon 03 Jun 2002, 19:07 GMT
- Re: Re: : Markets and Diversity, Tim Bousquet Mon 03 Jun 2002, 16:49 GMT
- testing: competition & diversity, Devine, James Mon 03 Jun 2002, 14:43 GMT
- markets & diversity, Devine, James Mon 03 Jun 2002, 14:01 GMT
- Re: markets & diversity, miychi Mon 03 Jun 2002, 14:50 GMT
- Canada, Ian Murray Mon 03 Jun 2002, 01:51 GMT
- academic capitalism, Ian Murray Mon 03 Jun 2002, 01:47 GMT