PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
RE: Lies, damned lies, and economics
Sorry; I originally sent this on the wrong thread.
Okay. I have an article which outlines my approach to teaching in all my
courses (though I am sorry to say it is mostly micro):
Robert Scott Gassler, "The Theory of Political and Social Economics: Beyond
the Neoclassical Perspective," Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, Vol.
9, No.2, 1998, pp.93-124.
The trick is to make a list of the assumptions of what I call the
"neoclassical default model" (perfect competition) and then treat them as
jumping-off places by relaxing the assumptions. By the time you are done,
you have systematically analysed a problem and destroyed students' interest
in the default model.
I think this will do a reasonably good job until we agree on a better
paradigm.
Robert Scott Gassler
Vesalius College
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
At 22:00 22/05/02 -0700, you wrote:
>I appreciate the reports that we get from people with expertise outside of
>the US. I wish that some of you lurkers would step in.
>--
>Michael Perelman
>Economics Department
>California State University
>Chico, CA 95929
>
>Tel. 530-898-5321
>E-Mail michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
- Thread context:
- Re: RE: Re: RE: Lies, damned lies, and economics, (continued)
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]