PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Re: RE: RE: Lies, damned lies, and economics
----- Original Message -----
From: "michael perelman" <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 8:20 PM
>Subject: [PEN-L:26168] Re: RE: RE: Lies, damned lies, and economics
> I might have added Phil Mirowski as an excellent writer, although he does
> not usually write for an popular audience.
>
> --
===============
What does it mean to say that economists deliberately *lie* in a world where
the relation of theories and evidences is one/many of underdetermination?
Ian
- Thread context:
- RE: Lies, damned lies, and economics, (continued)
- RE: Lies, damned lies, and economics,
Devine, James Tue 21 May 2002, 20:16 GMT
- Re: Lies, damned lies, and economics,
Justin Schwartz Tue 21 May 2002, 21:30 GMT
- RE: RE: Lies, damned lies, and economics,
Forstater, Mathew Tue 21 May 2002, 22:09 GMT
- RE: Lies, damned lies, and economics,
Sabri Oncu Wed 22 May 2002, 04:27 GMT
- RE: Re: Levins & Lewontin on Lysenko, was Re: Cuban cows,
Devine, James Tue 21 May 2002, 19:57 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]