Re: TPA and the new protectionism

To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: TPA and the new protectionism
From: michael perelman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 19:53:58 -0700

So, the democrats will give it to Georgie.  One question.  May Nathan knows.  Does the Kerry ammendment
mean that anybody (including US corps) can push such suits or that nobody can?  If the former, it is a
step backward.

--

Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: TPA and the new protectionism
  - From: Ian Murray

References:
- TPA and the new protectionism
  - From: Ian Murray

Prev by Date: Sony to build semiconductor plant in China Report
Next by Date: old ghosts
Previous by thread: TPA and the new protectionism
Next by thread: Re: Re: TPA and the new protectionism
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- old ghosts, Ian Murray Wed 22 May 2002, 03:02 GMT
- Sony to build semiconductor plant in China Report, Ulhas Joglekar Wed 22 May 2002, 01:50 GMT
- 'the buildup to build down', Ian Murray Wed 22 May 2002, 01:08 GMT
- TPA and the new protectionism, Ian Murray Tue 21 May 2002, 23:01 GMT
  - Re: TPA and the new protectionism, michael perelman Wed 22 May 2002, 02:52 GMT
    - Re: Re: TPA and the new protectionism, Ian Murray Wed 22 May 2002, 03:09 GMT
- Heilbroner, Devine, James Tue 21 May 2002, 22:35 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - RE: Heilbroner, Forstater, Mathew Tue 21 May 2002, 22:49 GMT
- Is the recession about over, Michael Perelman Tue 21 May 2002, 22:09 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]