PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Lies, damned lies, and economics
and economics
Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 13:09:04 -0700
Isn't that what lawyers are trained to do?
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 07:56:47PM +0000, Justin Schwartz wrote:
> Because it's hard to communicate clearly and effectively when you're
lying.
>
Lawyer jokes aside, no, it's not. Unlike economists, lawyers can lose their
licenses and go to jail if we lie to the court or our clients. And if most
lawyers don't communicate very clearly and effectively, it may be because in
part they're shading the truth. The best lawyers I have seen have been
painly honest and forthright. In fact they are good partly beacusethey are
up front. Of course being smart doesn't hurt either. jks
> But Friedman's popular writing isn't economics,
No. Can can write well in his technical articles and books.
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
- Thread context:
- Bono visits the happy natives,
Louis Proyect Tue 21 May 2002, 20:20 GMT
- Lies, damned lies, and economics,
Justin Schwartz Tue 21 May 2002, 20:02 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: Lies, damned lies, and economics,
Devine, James Tue 21 May 2002, 20:16 GMT
- Re: Lies, damned lies, and economics,
Justin Schwartz Tue 21 May 2002, 21:30 GMT
- RE: RE: Lies, damned lies, and economics,
Forstater, Mathew Tue 21 May 2002, 22:09 GMT
- RE: Lies, damned lies, and economics,
Sabri Oncu Wed 22 May 2002, 04:27 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]