PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
RE: Lies, damned lies, and economics
Justin: >But Friedman's popular writing isn't economics, it's standard
bourgeois
ideology of a rather blatant sort. I recently reread parts of Cap & Freedom,
same old same old. No attempt to do what Gould does, explain scientific
results to the general reader. You know who's good at this in econ, aside
from Galbraith (meantioned below) is Heilbroner.<
Both Galbraith (the father) & Heilbroner write well, but (IMHO) don't have
very much to say. They look good because the economics profession is so bad.
I find that Heilbroner presents a very watered-down vision of Marx, while
Galbraith seems to be an updated Veblen.
Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
- Thread context:
- Marxism, philosophy and biology,
ScottH9999 Tue 21 May 2002, 20:53 GMT
- Bono visits the happy natives,
Louis Proyect Tue 21 May 2002, 20:20 GMT
- Lies, damned lies, and economics,
Justin Schwartz Tue 21 May 2002, 20:02 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: Lies, damned lies, and economics,
Devine, James Tue 21 May 2002, 20:16 GMT
- Re: Lies, damned lies, and economics,
Justin Schwartz Tue 21 May 2002, 21:30 GMT
- RE: RE: Lies, damned lies, and economics,
Forstater, Mathew Tue 21 May 2002, 22:09 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]