Re: PK on accounting reform

To: "'pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PK on accounting reform
From: "Fred B. Moseley" <fmoseley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 10:21:27 -0400 (EDT)

On Tue, 21 May 2002, Devine, James wrote:

> By the way, a media evaluation web-page voted PK's column the most
> consistently partisan of op-ed regulars. As I told PK, "not that there's
> anything wrong with it."

More partisan that pro-Israeli fire-eater and let's-go-get-Saddam
William Safire?

Fred

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PK on accounting reform
  - From: Michael Pollak

References:
- PK on accounting reform
  - From: Devine, James

Prev by Date: PK on accounting reform
Next by Date: Re: The Storming of the Accountants
Previous by thread: PK on accounting reform
Next by thread: Re: PK on accounting reform
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Spitzer wimps out, Ian Murray Tue 21 May 2002, 14:38 GMT
  - Re: Spritzer wimps out, Bill Lear Tue 21 May 2002, 19:41 GMT
- Re: The Storming of the Accountants, W.R. Needham Tue 21 May 2002, 14:35 GMT
- PK on accounting reform, Devine, James Tue 21 May 2002, 14:15 GMT
  - Re: PK on accounting reform, Fred B. Moseley Tue 21 May 2002, 14:27 GMT
    - Re: PK on accounting reform, Michael Pollak Tue 21 May 2002, 16:50 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - RE: Re: PK on accounting reform, Devine, James Tue 21 May 2002, 15:08 GMT
    - Re: RE: Re: PK on accounting reform, Carrol Cox Tue 21 May 2002, 16:42 GMT
- The Terrorist's Lawyer, Justin Schwartz Tue 21 May 2002, 04:23 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]