Re: ARgument for socialism

To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: ARgument for socialism
From: "Justin Schwartz" <jkschw@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 22:42:57 +0000

>
>That socialism is a defense against terrorism is, of course, not a strong
>argument for socialism

(I said): Didn't someone say "socialism or barbarism" and didn't someone
else say,
"the revolutionary transformation of society or the common ruin of the
contending classes"?

jks

^^^^^^^^

CB: Yea, Socialism or Else !

You would put it that way. jks

_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com

Prev by Date: ARgument for socialism
Next by Date: Hutton's declaration of war 2
Previous by thread: ARgument for socialism
Next by thread: Dean Acheson on Peron
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- ARgument for socialism, Justin Schwartz Sat 18 May 2002, 22:59 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - RE: ARgument for socialism, Devine, James Sat 18 May 2002, 23:25 GMT
    - Re: RE: ARgument for socialism, Michael Pollak Sun 19 May 2002, 07:05 GMT
  - ARgument for socialism, Charles Brown Mon 20 May 2002, 22:19 GMT
  - Re: ARgument for socialism, Justin Schwartz Mon 20 May 2002, 22:50 GMT
- What NACLA used to read like, Louis Proyect Sat 18 May 2002, 22:03 GMT
  - Re: What NACLA used to read like, Michael Perelman Sat 18 May 2002, 22:32 GMT
  - Re: What NACLA used to read like, Ignacio Perrotini Hernández Mon 20 May 2002, 19:56 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: What NACLA used to read like, Michael Hoover Mon 20 May 2002, 14:12 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]