Re: RE: Re: Re: RE: Hetero Depts

To: <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: RE: Re: Re: RE: Hetero Depts
From: "Ian Murray" <seamus2001@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 08:24:04 -0700

----- Original Message -----
From: "Lee, Frederic" <leefs@xxxxxxxx>

 I would add to Professor Henwood's comment that it has been the policy
of most all of the prestige departments to not hire heterodox economists


============

Ok Doug 'fess up, what invisible college are you affiliated with?

Ian

References:
- RE: Re: Re: RE: Hetero Depts
  - From: Lee, Frederic

Prev by Date: Re: RE: Hetero Depts
Next by Date: Re: Re: RE: Hetero Depts
Previous by thread: RE: Re: Re: RE: Hetero Depts
Next by thread: Hetero Depts
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- RE: Hetero Depts, (continued)
  - RE: Hetero Depts, Devine, James Tue 14 May 2002, 14:00 GMT
    - Re: RE: Hetero Depts, Doug Henwood Tue 14 May 2002, 15:27 GMT
      
      Re: Re: RE: Hetero Depts, Ann Li Tue 14 May 2002, 16:34 GMT
  - RE: Re: Re: RE: Hetero Depts, Lee, Frederic Tue 14 May 2002, 14:02 GMT
    - Re: RE: Re: Re: RE: Hetero Depts, Ian Murray Tue 14 May 2002, 15:28 GMT
  - Hetero Depts, Joshua Bragg Tue 14 May 2002, 19:52 GMT
    - Re: Hetero Depts, Doug Henwood Tue 14 May 2002, 19:57 GMT
    - Re: Hetero Depts, Anthony D'Costa Tue 14 May 2002, 20:25 GMT
  - RE: Hetero Depts, Forstater, Mathew Tue 14 May 2002, 21:49 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]