Difference between leadership and command

[miychi <miyachi9@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 2002.04.17 07:20 AM, "Sabri Oncu" <soncu@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Miyachi wrote:
>
>> Thank you for your reply
>>
>> As for decentralized responsibility, party cell duty is
>> regular report to central committee and maintain  party's
>> program. If he has not ability to this duty, simply he must
>> give up, or choose to change his duty. Here no command exists.
>> Only member's will and passion is required. In a sense This
>> type of organization is network-type like Al-Qaeda. On the
> contrary,
>> for example, in US financial corporations as you, You may
> decision
>> business yourself, but you must seek profit in decentralized
>> responsibility. If you fail to raise profit, you fire. It is
> the
>> difference between party and corporation.
>
> I am not sure if there is a serious difference between party and
> corporation, except from the objectives. Both are organizations
> with objectives.
>
> If in a "democratically centralized" party, that is, in a party
> where leadership is centralized whereas responsibility is
> decentralized, what is required is only the member's will and
> passion, and there is no command, why do we need leaders, or a
> program? Will and passion would suffice, wouldn't they?
>
> Also, how are we going to decide whose duty is what and whether a
> person has the ability to perform his/her duty?
>
> I think these are important questions to discuss.
>
> Thanks Miyachi for your contributions,
>
> Sabri
>
> P.S: I am against commands of any kind, by the way. Just say
> please, please.
>
Comrade Sabri

 Firstly, leadership and command are different. Leadership is appeal to
action, whereas command require compulsion. If party central committee
appeal demonstration or attack, party-members and non-party mass can and
must choose to participate in demonstration or attack It is problem of
individual's will, not duty. Party committee can't and must not force people
participate in its own appeal. If some people reject to participate, it is
their decisions and must respect it. But its result is responsible for
them,not others. ON the contrary, as you worked in company, although in
decentralized network as possible  and in responsible post, you must raise
profit. It is economical tacit command, even if your action seems to be
free. The reason was already described formerly mail.

 Secondly, who decide member's ability? It is self-decision. Others only
recommend but final decision depends on themselves.

Stalin degenerate party organization, i.e. Command system, and most of
people considers vanguard party as such. It is incorrect. It can prove from
Lenin's original paper, mail, etc.

That is my opinion, result of study Lenin's original paper, and finally
conclusion of experience of 60s world-wide revolutionary movements.
I respect mostly your freedom, but unhappily, we live in "Prison society"
How can we get liberty? Only by struggle. This is my answer.

MIYACHI TATSUO
Psychiatric Department
Komaki municipal hosipital
1-20.JOHBUHSHI
KOMAKI CITY
AICHI PREF.
486-0044
TEL:0568-76-4131
FAX 0568-76-4145
miyachi9@xxxxxxxxxx