PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Binary scheme of democracy and centralism
Michael writes:
> You are absolutely correct.
>
> "Devine, James" wrote:
>
>> My impression is that Williamson studies non-market
>> institutions in order to show that corporate hierarchies
>> are a good thing.
I don't know whether he studies market or non-market institutions
but other than that what Jim said was more or less what he told
me or what I recall from the things he told me: hierarchical
and/or centralized forms of governance for the institutions of
capitalism are/can be better than other organizational forms.
Moreover, he had no urge to make use of the word "democracy" as
he was making his claims. As I heard many times in the business
world:
"We are a business, we are not a democracy!"
Here is another one:
"We are not in the business of doing good. We do business and
good comes out of it!"
More or less, that is, as far as I recall.
Sabri
- Thread context:
- Re: Re: Binary scheme of democracy and centralism, (continued)
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]