Re: Difference between corporations and party responsibility

[Sabri Oncu <soncu@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Miyachi wrote:

> Thank you for your reply
>
> As for decentralized responsibility, party cell duty is
> regular report to central committee and maintain  party's
> program. If he has not ability to this duty, simply he must
> give up, or choose to change his duty. Here no command exists.
> Only member's will and passion is required. In a sense This
> type of organization is network-type like Al-Qaeda. On the
contrary,
> for example, in US financial corporations as you, You may
decision
> business yourself, but you must seek profit in decentralized
> responsibility. If you fail to raise profit, you fire. It is
the
> difference between party and corporation.

I am not sure if there is a serious difference between party and
corporation, except from the objectives. Both are organizations
with objectives.

If in a "democratically centralized" party, that is, in a party
where leadership is centralized whereas responsibility is
decentralized, what is required is only the member's will and
passion, and there is no command, why do we need leaders, or a
program? Will and passion would suffice, wouldn't they?

Also, how are we going to decide whose duty is what and whether a
person has the ability to perform his/her duty?

I think these are important questions to discuss.

Thanks Miyachi for your contributions,

Sabri

P.S: I am against commands of any kind, by the way. Just say
please, please.