Re: Nash equilibrium's relevance

To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Nash equilibrium's relevance
From: michael perelman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 20:07:27 -0700

Again, Phil Mirowski's new book is excellent on this.

--

Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

References:
- Nash equilibrium's relevance
  - From: Devine, James

Prev by Date: Re: Nash equilibrium's relevance
Next by Date: Re: Palestine
Previous by thread: Re: Nash equilibrium's relevance
Next by thread: RE: Nash equilibrium's relevance
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- FROM PORT HURON* TO KENT STATE, Charles Brown Thu 11 Apr 2002, 17:25 GMT
- Nash equilibrium's relevance, Devine, James Thu 11 Apr 2002, 16:00 GMT
  - Re: Nash equilibrium's relevance, Gil Skillman Thu 11 Apr 2002, 18:20 GMT
  - Re: Nash equilibrium's relevance, Shane Mage Fri 12 Apr 2002, 03:01 GMT
  - Re: Nash equilibrium's relevance, michael perelman Fri 12 Apr 2002, 03:04 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - RE: Nash equilibrium's relevance, Davies, Daniel Thu 11 Apr 2002, 16:25 GMT
  - RE: Re: Nash equilibrium's relevance, Devine, James Thu 11 Apr 2002, 21:03 GMT
  - RE: Re: Nash equilibrium's relevance, Devine, James Fri 12 Apr 2002, 03:22 GMT
  - Re: Nash equilibrium's relevance, Sabri Oncu Fri 12 Apr 2002, 05:58 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]