PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
RE: Re: More on Argentina
Charles J. writes:
>I wouldn't emphasize the dependence on canned meat and weetabix exports as
very explanatory. Of course it might have helped had Brazil also not been
such an agricultural producer.<
I'd say that the problem was that British dominance during the 19th century
prevented Argentina from imitating the U.S. of that era, i.e., building up
industry behind tariff walls in order to serve the domestic market. It had a
lot of the other characteristics of white settler colonies (including the
U.S.) By the time that Argentina got around to Import-Substituting
Industrialization, it was a bit too late (though it _might_ have succeeded).
Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
- Thread context:
- Fw: [R-G] 03.04.2002 THE GRAND OIL PRICE & TERRORISM CONSPIRACY - STOP!!! THE RUMORS!,
michael pugliese Wed 03 Apr 2002, 17:57 GMT
- Hedge funds face up to dismal returns,
Ulhas Joglekar Wed 03 Apr 2002, 17:42 GMT
- Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: Did the boom benefit workers????,
Ignacio Perrotini Hernández Wed 03 Apr 2002, 17:30 GMT
- RE: Re: More on Argentina,
Devine, James Wed 03 Apr 2002, 16:52 GMT
- : We are what's left,
Charles Brown Wed 03 Apr 2002, 15:40 GMT
- Bureaucracy,
Charles Brown Wed 03 Apr 2002, 15:23 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]