PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: Did the boom benefit workers????
Dears James and Doug,
I do agree with Doug. There is an overwhelming empirical evidence in favor
of the hypothesis that exchange rate movements have contributed almost
nothing to economic growth in the last decades. Kaldor, Thirlwall, and
McCombie are good references on that. Hyperdeflation may have contributed
somehow to rising productivity. However, in the last analysis, despite New
Macroeconomists´ and monetarists' beliefs, the "successful" disinflation of
the world economy has less to do with "smart" Central Banks' monetary
policies than with the high-tech revolution.
Ignacio
At 03:01 p.m. 26/03/02 -0500, you wrote:
Devine, James wrote:
Is there any way that _measured_ productivity could grow due to a rising
dollar exchange rate?
Can't see how. A lot of the rise in productivity is the result of crazy
output growth in high-tech, because of the quality-adjusted price indexes.
Doug
- Thread context:
- Updates: A20 Mobe,
michael pugliese Wed 03 Apr 2002, 23:37 GMT
- The best allies money and oil can buy,
Ken Hanly Wed 03 Apr 2002, 18:59 GMT
- Fw: [R-G] 03.04.2002 THE GRAND OIL PRICE & TERRORISM CONSPIRACY - STOP!!! THE RUMORS!,
michael pugliese Wed 03 Apr 2002, 17:57 GMT
- Hedge funds face up to dismal returns,
Ulhas Joglekar Wed 03 Apr 2002, 17:42 GMT
- Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: Did the boom benefit workers????,
Ignacio Perrotini Hernández Wed 03 Apr 2002, 17:30 GMT
- RE: Re: More on Argentina,
Devine, James Wed 03 Apr 2002, 16:52 GMT
- : We are what's left,
Charles Brown Wed 03 Apr 2002, 15:40 GMT
- Bureaucracy,
Charles Brown Wed 03 Apr 2002, 15:23 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]