>"[Nader] would not advocate public ownership of >productive assets. . . .
Well, some, maybe, but virtually all? >
Not nearly all. Nader is no socialist. I presume perhaps wrongly that 'left' is a broader category than 'socialist.'
Of course. I was talking about what his views were. not whether they are "left." They're left enough for me! jks
_________________________________________________________________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
- RE: RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: We are what's left, (continued)
- RE: RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: We are what's left, Forstater, Mathew Tue 02 Apr 2002, 18:21 GMT
- RE: RE: RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: We are what's left, Max Sawicky Tue 02 Apr 2002, 19:36 GMT
- Re: RE: RE: RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: We are what's left, Michael Perelman Tue 02 Apr 2002, 20:29 GMT
- RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: We are what's left, Forstater, Mathew Tue 02 Apr 2002, 21:17 GMT
- Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Nader, Justin Schwartz Mon 01 Apr 2002, 16:06 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Nader, Charles Brown Mon 01 Apr 2002, 17:42 GMT
- Re: Nader, Sabri Oncu Tue 02 Apr 2002, 01:15 GMT
- RE: Re: Nader, Devine, James Tue 02 Apr 2002, 03:06 GMT
- A challenge in China, Ulhas Joglekar Mon 01 Apr 2002, 15:45 GMT