PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Nader
>"[Nader] would not advocate public ownership of
>productive assets. . . .
Well, some, maybe, but virtually all? I mean Do you think he'd support
nationalizing all corporations above a certain low level, treating the mines
and the factories and fields and offices as belonging to the government and
to be controlled by the workers and farmers? Which in some sense is what
most of us here, including me, would advocate. jks
Not nearly all. Nader is no socialist.
I presume perhaps wrongly that 'left' is a broader
category than 'socialist.'
mbs
- Thread context:
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Nader, (continued)
- Fractional Reserve Banking as Economic Parasitism: A Scientific, Mathematical and Historical Expose, Critique, and Manifesto,
Michael Perelman Sun 31 Mar 2002, 02:23 GMT
- Question to dd re PEN-L digest 81,
Hari Kumar Sun 31 Mar 2002, 00:07 GMT
- American Friends Service Committee: "Criminally extremist",
Ken Hanly Sat 30 Mar 2002, 17:11 GMT
- Industrial production unlikely to achieve 9th Plan target,
Ulhas Joglekar Sat 30 Mar 2002, 12:51 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]