PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
RE: Re: We are what's left
>I'm not an expert, but I would summarize Smith's theory as the
>good social effect resulting from narrow, self-seeking activity.
>I defy anyone to find support for that among the old populists
>or in Nader's movement.
>
Smith would not accept this characterization, as you perfectly well know.
jks
Come again? What vileness are you accusing me of now?
mbs
- Thread context:
- Re: We are what's left, (continued)
- Re: We are what's left,
Michael Perelman Sun 31 Mar 2002, 17:15 GMT
- RE: Re: We are what's left,
Devine, James Sun 31 Mar 2002, 16:32 GMT
- Re: We are what's left,
Justin Schwartz Sun 31 Mar 2002, 18:13 GMT
- RE: We are what's left,
Austin, Andrew Sun 31 Mar 2002, 18:21 GMT
- Comparative advantage of poverty,
Chris Burford Sun 31 Mar 2002, 11:06 GMT
- India's fx reserves cross $53 bn mark, BoP surplus at $5.56 bn,
Ulhas Joglekar Sun 31 Mar 2002, 10:46 GMT
- metaphors and steel wars,
Ian Murray Sun 31 Mar 2002, 07:42 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]