I'm not an expert, but I would summarize Smith's theory as the good social effect resulting from narrow, self-seeking activity. I defy anyone to find support for that among the old populists or in Nader's movement.
Smith would not accept this characterization, as you perfectly well know.
jks
_________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
- Re: We are what's left, (continued)
- Re: We are what's left, michael perelman Mon 01 Apr 2002, 05:46 GMT
- Re: We are what's left, Michael Perelman Sun 31 Mar 2002, 17:15 GMT
- Re: Krugman, Globalism and Steel, phillp2 Sun 31 Mar 2002, 18:38 GMT
- RE: Re: We are what's left, Devine, James Sun 31 Mar 2002, 16:32 GMT
- Re: We are what's left, Justin Schwartz Sun 31 Mar 2002, 18:13 GMT
- RE: Re: We are what's left, Max B. Sawicky Mon 01 Apr 2002, 05:04 GMT
- RE: We are what's left, Austin, Andrew Sun 31 Mar 2002, 18:21 GMT
- Comparative advantage of poverty, Chris Burford Sun 31 Mar 2002, 11:06 GMT
- India's fx reserves cross $53 bn mark, BoP surplus at $5.56 bn, Ulhas Joglekar Sun 31 Mar 2002, 10:46 GMT