PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Re: Re: Nader
There were two lines in the New Deal. The corporatists were not dominant
at first -- the Thurman Arnold, trust-busting line, was. The idea was
that corporate power caused the Depression by keeping prices high and
curtailing output.
On Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 02:29:55PM +0000, Justin Schwartz wrote:
>
> Actually the old New Deal (pre 1937) was opposed to competition and very
> much in favor of corporativist planning. The New Dealers were very impressed
> by the successes of the WWI War economy and the apparant successes of the
> USSR in those days in avoiding the ravages of the Great Depression, and if
> you read the histories of the period, they utterly rejected the invisible
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread context:
- Re: Nader, (continued)
- Re: Nader,
Michael Perelman Sun 31 Mar 2002, 04:09 GMT
- Re: Re: Nader,
Mohammad Maljoo Sun 31 Mar 2002, 08:50 GMT
- Re: Re: Nader,
Justin Schwartz Sun 31 Mar 2002, 14:32 GMT
- RE: Re: Re: Re: Nader,
michael pugliese Sun 31 Mar 2002, 17:49 GMT
- RE: Re:: Nader,
michael pugliese Sun 31 Mar 2002, 17:55 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Nader,
Justin Schwartz Sun 31 Mar 2002, 18:06 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]