PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
RE: Re: RE: Krugman
also, fitting with your initial point, I doubt that PK can imagine such an
animal as democratic globalization...
Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian Murray [mailto:seamus2001@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 12:12 PM
> To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [PEN-L:24459] Re: RE: Krugman
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Devine, James" <jdevine@xxxxxxx>
> > I don't think he listens to me, but I'll try.
> >
> > It's not just a lack of imagination: posing the question as
> "globalization
> > vs. anti-globalization" -- as opposed to "capitalist
> globalization vs.
> > democratic globalization" -- biases the answer in favor of
> the former.
> >
> ===============
>
> I know that. I was just pointing out the lack of imagination
> in creating the binary in the first
> place so that the bias of it is tilted. Blast the politics of
> vocabularies! :->
>
> Ian
>
> "Consent falls apart in the battle of descriptions." [Kim Scheppele]
>
- Thread context:
- Kenan Evren Chair in Turkish Studies,
Sabri Oncu Fri 29 Mar 2002, 19:14 GMT
- Krugman,
Ian Murray Fri 29 Mar 2002, 16:16 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: Krugman,
Devine, James Fri 29 Mar 2002, 19:53 GMT
- RE: Re: RE: Krugman,
Devine, James Fri 29 Mar 2002, 20:54 GMT
- RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Krugman,
Devine, James Fri 29 Mar 2002, 21:25 GMT
- FW: Krugman,
Devine, James Fri 29 Mar 2002, 21:57 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]