PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Re: Re: Question Romain K.
Romain Kroes wrote:
>
> Because "historical materialism" has become a label.
I don't get it. "Literary Criticism" has become a label. "Frying Bacon"
has become a label. We still don't usually put them in scare quotes.
And if your point is that it names lots of contradictory things -- is
ambiguous: so is every other word and phrase in the language, all of
which need to be defined in context. So what are you getting at?
Consider a book title: Democracy Against Capitalism: Renewing Historical
Materialism. Would you argue that Meiksins Wood should have entitled her
book, _Democracy Against Capitalism_ Renewing "Historical Materialism_"?
But that wouldn't do, There are other labels in that title. Perhaps she
should have entitled it _"Democracy" "Against" "Capitalism": "Renewing"
"Historical Materialism_." Would that satisfy you? Or should the last
two words have been "'Historical' 'Materialism'"?
Carrol
- Thread context:
- Sweatshops, (continued)
- Re: Re: Question Romain K.,
Waistline2 Tue 05 Mar 2002, 17:59 GMT
- Yen,
Charles Brown Tue 05 Mar 2002, 17:21 GMT
- Re: Yen,
Charles Jannuzi Wed 06 Mar 2002, 02:49 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Yen,
Charles Jannuzi Wed 06 Mar 2002, 06:16 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]