PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Marx vs. Roemer
CB: If you mean that capitalist exploitation is characterized by a less
directly coercive method than feudalism or slavery, Marx already made that
point. Roemer does not improve on what Marx has already taught.
On this point I agree with you, as I explain in IDoE, which I believe you
have. On other points, R does imprive on Marx.
jks
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
- Thread context:
- RE: Re: Marx vs. Roemer, (continued)
- RE: Re: Marx vs. Roemer,
Devine, James Wed 06 Mar 2002, 18:11 GMT
- Re: RE: Re: Marx vs. Roemer,
Justin Schwartz Wed 06 Mar 2002, 19:02 GMT
- Marx vs. Roemer,
Charles Brown Wed 06 Mar 2002, 22:00 GMT
- Re: Marx vs. Roemer,
Justin Schwartz Wed 06 Mar 2002, 22:39 GMT
- Marx vs. Roemer,
Charles Brown Thu 07 Mar 2002, 20:01 GMT
- Re: Marx vs. Roemer,
Justin Schwartz Thu 07 Mar 2002, 20:07 GMT
- Re: Re: Peter,
Waistline2 Wed 06 Mar 2002, 10:16 GMT
- trading waste,
Ian Murray Wed 06 Mar 2002, 05:16 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]