PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Re: Peter
In a message dated Tue, 5 Mar 2002 5:33:55 PM Eastern Standard Time, Peter Dorman <dormanp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Right. I argued in "Actually Existing Globalization" (published in a collection a
> few years ago) that industrial policy is ultimately understandable only as
> technology policy, but that the era of national technology (or innovation) systems
> is largely over. At the time I reviewed some of the literature pro and con; I
> think there are some references in my article. I'll be glad to send an electronic
> copy to anyone interested.
>
> Peter
>
> Bill Rosenberg wrote:
>
> > Is anyone familiar with the "National Systems of Innovation" approach to
> > economic development? The Labour/Alliance government has announced an economic
> > strategy which is said to owe much to this. I understand that Chris Freeman
> > (UK), Bengt-Åke Lundvall (Denmark), Charles Edquist (Sweden) and Richard Nelson
> > (New York) are leaders in the field. Any views would be welcome.
> >
> > Bill
Please Send copy of paper.
Melvin P
- Thread context:
- Marx vs. Roemer, (continued)
- Re: Re: Peter,
Waistline2 Wed 06 Mar 2002, 10:16 GMT
- trading waste,
Ian Murray Wed 06 Mar 2002, 05:16 GMT
- job offer,
michael perelman Wed 06 Mar 2002, 04:32 GMT
- more job offers,
michael perelman Wed 06 Mar 2002, 04:31 GMT
- Rats in the Grain -- again,
michael perelman Wed 06 Mar 2002, 04:10 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]