PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Roemer vs. Marx in Vietnam?
From: "Devine, James" <jdevine@xxxxxxx>
Reply-To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: "'pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [PEN-L:23537] Roemer vs. Marx in Vietnam?
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 10:05:29 -0800
[was: RE: [PEN-L:23532] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Wade vs Wolf]
Doug Henwood wrote:>>A friend of mine who spent a few years as a reporter
in
Vietnam interviewed Nike workers who told her that they prefer their
sweatshop jobs to what they would have been doing otherwise - things like
chasing rats in rice paddies (not much fun to be a woman on the farm).<<
Ian writes:
> This of course raises, again, the issue of Marx' vs. Roemer's
> views on exploitation.....
Roemer is on record as saying that many agricultural laborers found factory
labor liberating. I criticized him for being unhistorical; he ignores the
savage breaking of the new working class to time and labor disciplibe by
poor laws and the like. That said, it may be true in some cases today.
Is there a reserve army of labor (or something similar) in Vietnam? If
there
isn't, then Roemer's case of people voluntarily choosing to be exploited
may
apply.
There's a bitter joke that in a labor market the only thing that is worse
than being exploited is not being exploited . . . .
>But if there is, the structural coercion implicit in that reserve army
would
imply that the choices aren't so voluntary, so that Marx's story applies.
Well, coercion is not incompatible with voluntariness. You can be forced to
do what you'd do anyway. Coercion is objective and external. Voluntariness
refers to a state of mind.
Though I could be wrong, my understanding is that Roemer would have
accepted
Marx's story (of capitalist exploitation as based on structural coercion)
when he developed his own story, but saw the structural coercion as
unnecessary to the existence of exploitation.
That is exactly correct.
jks
_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
- Thread context:
- GATS,
Ian Murray Tue 05 Mar 2002, 19:09 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- GATS,
Charles Brown Tue 05 Mar 2002, 21:23 GMT
- déjà vu all over again,
Devine, James Tue 05 Mar 2002, 18:21 GMT
- Roemer vs. Marx in Vietnam?,
Devine, James Tue 05 Mar 2002, 18:14 GMT
- Re: Re: Question Romain K.,
Waistline2 Tue 05 Mar 2002, 17:59 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]