PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
RE: Question to Various comments in In Digest 77
> CB: Doesn't _The Manifesto of the Communist Party_ make it
> pretty clear that Marx's theory of history is rooted in the
> relations of production aspect of the forces of production,
> the division of labor, and the class struggle ? History is a
> history of class struggles, not technological innovations.
> Since producers are part of the forces of production , it is
> their development that is in the forces of production that
> makes history, and historical revolutions.
One of the problems is that the categories "relations of production" and
"forces of production" overlap. The division of labor, for example, is both
a relationship among producers (part of the RofP) and promotes the
productivity of labor (part of the FoP).
JD
- Thread context:
- Re: Re: Re: Question to Various comments in In Digest 77, (continued)
- Question to Various comments in In Digest 77,
Charles Brown Sun 03 Mar 2002, 22:24 GMT
- Re: Question to Various comments in In Digest 77,
Justin Schwartz Mon 04 Mar 2002, 05:51 GMT
- Question to Various comments in In Digest 77,
Charles Brown Mon 04 Mar 2002, 17:57 GMT
- RE: Question to Various comments in In Digest 77,
Devine, James Mon 04 Mar 2002, 18:11 GMT
- Re: Question to Various comments in In Digest 77,
Justin Schwartz Tue 05 Mar 2002, 04:32 GMT
- Re: Question to Various comments in In Digest 77,
Waistline2 Tue 05 Mar 2002, 12:09 GMT
- Question to Various comments in In Digest 77,
Charles Brown Tue 05 Mar 2002, 16:58 GMT
- Re: Question to Various comments in In Digest 77,
Waistline2 Tue 05 Mar 2002, 17:46 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]