Re: RE: Suppression of Marx

To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: RE: Suppression of Marx
From: Michael Perelman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 08:22:01 -0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.2i

Was Sraffa a Sraffian/neo-Ricardian; did he ever go beyond critiquing
neo-classical garbage?

On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 10:07:16AM -0600, Forstater, Mathew wrote:
> There is a difference between making an unconvincing argument of logical
> inconsistency and claiming a logical inconsistency without any attempt
> to demonstrate it.  (By the way, I never understood the Sraffian
> argument against the LTV as in general based on logical inconsistency--I
> thought it was that the LTV was redundant and therefore unnecessary--an
> argument I do not buy, by the way.) mat
>

--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

References:
- RE: Suppression of Marx
  - From: Forstater, Mathew

Prev by Date: Re: RE: Suppression of Marx
Next by Date: Re: Re: Suppression of Marx
Previous by thread: RE: Suppression of Marx
Next by thread: Re: RE: Suppression of Marx
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Veblenron, Forstater, Mathew Mon 04 Mar 2002, 16:13 GMT
- Taliban and Aschcroft, Ken Hanly Mon 04 Mar 2002, 16:09 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - RE: Taliban and Aschcroft, Devine, James Mon 04 Mar 2002, 16:19 GMT
- RE: Suppression of Marx, Forstater, Mathew Mon 04 Mar 2002, 16:08 GMT
  - Re: RE: Suppression of Marx, Michael Perelman Mon 04 Mar 2002, 16:24 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: RE: Suppression of Marx, Justin Schwartz Mon 04 Mar 2002, 16:20 GMT
  - Re: Re: Suppression of Marx, Waistline2 Mon 04 Mar 2002, 16:25 GMT
    - Re: Re: Re: Suppression of Marx, Romain Kroes Tue 05 Mar 2002, 12:19 GMT
  - RE: Re: Suppression of Marx, Devine, James Mon 04 Mar 2002, 16:56 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]