PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
RE: Suppression of Marx
- To: <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Suppression of Marx
- From: "Forstater, Mathew" <ForstaterM@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 10:07:16 -0600
- Thread-index: AcHDfG8uWbmDA6+1SnK/mrNvqQKMOAAGYScQ
- Thread-topic: [PEN-L:23451] Suppression of Marx
There is a difference between making an unconvincing argument of logical
inconsistency and claiming a logical inconsistency without any attempt
to demonstrate it. (By the way, I never understood the Sraffian
argument against the LTV as in general based on logical inconsistency--I
thought it was that the LTV was redundant and therefore unnecessary--an
argument I do not buy, by the way.) mat
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]