PEN-L
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

Re: Re: Some questions




Michael Perelman wrote:
>
> Sabri, Marx's theory in question here is about value -- a form of social
> relations peculiar to capitalism.  As such, it would not have relevance
> under socialism.
>

Sweezy saw the premise that "economic science" would exist under
socialism as the ideological basis of authoritarian socialism.
Supposedly production will be for use, and productive choices will be
made politically. That can't be reduced to a science. (I think I've
botched up the argument some.)

Carrol




Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]