RE: Commodity fetish

To: <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Commodity fetish
From: "Eric Nilsson" <enilsson@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 07:15:06 -0800

 Doug Henwood wrote:
>  I'll bet a lot of PEN-Lers don't approve of makeup or stylish clothes
either.

Hold on. Readers of the WSJ (a few days ago) know that the _newest_ fashions
have rips, tears, and wrinkles and look, in general, very beat up and old.
Because of this fashion development, I am now--and have for
years--exceedingly and proudly stylish.

Eric

References:
- Commodity fetish
  - From: Charles Brown

Prev by Date: Re: Dallas Smythe student
Next by Date: BLS Daily Report, Tuesday Feb. 26
Previous by thread: Commodity fetish
Next by thread: BLS Daily Report, Tuesday Feb. 26
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- reply-part 2, Waistline2 Tue 26 Feb 2002, 17:15 GMT
  - Productive Forces, was Re: reply-part 2, Carrol Cox Tue 26 Feb 2002, 18:26 GMT
- BLS Daily Report, Tuesday Feb. 26, Richardson_D Tue 26 Feb 2002, 15:44 GMT
- Commodity fetish, Charles Brown Tue 26 Feb 2002, 15:03 GMT
  - RE: Commodity fetish, Eric Nilsson Tue 26 Feb 2002, 15:19 GMT
- Hari reply/bribery and labor aristoc., Waistline2 Tue 26 Feb 2002, 14:07 GMT
- Fwd: IWGVT mini-conference at the EEA Boston Park Plaza, March 13-17. Apologies for cross-posting, Drewk Tue 26 Feb 2002, 13:52 GMT
- The Disappeared, Ken Hanly Tue 26 Feb 2002, 04:46 GMT
- Washington Consensus in question?, Steve Diamond Tue 26 Feb 2002, 04:20 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]