RE: Re: on the necessity of god, goddess, gods, god desses,or a combinati on of the above

["Devine, James" <jdevine@xxxxxxx>]

I wrote: >> As far as I can tell, there's no logical argument either for or
against the existence of "god."<<

Carrol:
> The presumption is always that X doesn't exist; hence the absence of
> convincing arguments against the existence of X is in no way evidence
> that X exists.

that's why my working hypothesis -- the one I put into practice in my life
-- is that there's no god (or goddess) even though I'm an agnostic.

Of course, when I get up to heaven Shiva will send me back as a cockroach.

which of course means that I (and my fellow roaches) will inherit the earth.

JD