RE: RE: RE: RE: Krugman Komes Around

["Devine, James" <jdevine@xxxxxxx>]

I'll have to call my lawyer and cancel the lawsuit...

Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx &  http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Max Sawicky [mailto:sawicky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 3:04 PM
> To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [PEN-L:23087] RE: RE: RE: Krugman Komes Around
>
>
> no i meant you weren' t the only one w/claims to pre-K
> vision.
>
> mbs
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Devine, James
> > Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 5:44 PM
> > To: 'pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> > Subject: [PEN-L:23086] RE: RE: Krugman Komes Around
> >
> >
> > Max, I don't understand your point. It sounds like PK is leaning
> > in the EPI
> > direction on this one.
> >
> > Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx &  http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Max Sawicky [mailto:sawicky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 11:32 AM
> > > To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [PEN-L:23076] RE: Krugman Komes Around
> > >
> > >
> > > Not so fast Sparky.
> > >
> > > http://www.epinet.org/Issuebriefs/ib175.html
> > >
> > > http://www.epinet.org/webfeatures/econindicators/jobspict.html
> > >
> > > http://www.epinet.org/briefingpapers/bp121.html
> > >
> > >
> > > mbs
> > >
> > > > [Maybe I should sue because of violation of my intellectual
> > > > property rights
> > > > (see
> > >
> http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/faculty/jdevine/talks/ESTalk020502.htm) ;-)
> > > > ... still, this is a pretty good article.]
> > >
> > > > The W Scenario
> > > > By PAUL KRUGMAN
> > > > First comes the victory parade. Later we'll find out if we won.
> > >
> >
>