PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
RE: Re: on the necessity of god, goddess, gods, god desses, or a combinati on of the above
> Actually, neoclassical general equilibrium economists have proved
> that God exists. The tatonnement auctioneer! All knowing,
> capable of millions of decisions instantaniously, does not need to
> be paid to exist, and able to determine the future in perpetuity.
> Sounds like God to me.
strictly speaking, these folks are like good theologians: they assume that
God exists. The stupid ones don't know that it's an assumption.
Jim Devine
- Prev by Date:
Re: on the necessity of god, goddess, gods, goddesses, or a combination of the above
- Next by Date:
Re: Re: on the necessity of god, goddess, gods, goddesses, or a combination of the above
- Previous by thread:
Re: on the necessity of god, goddess, gods, goddesses, or a combination of the above
- Next by thread:
Re: RE: Re: on the necessity of god, goddess, gods, goddesses, or a combinati on of the above
- Index(es):
- Thread context:
- Re: Re: on the necessity of god, goddess, gods, goddesses, or a combinati on of the above, (continued)
- BLS Daily Report, Friday Feb. 22,
Richardson_D Fri 22 Feb 2002, 22:23 GMT
- Economists vs CEOs,
Sabri Oncu Fri 22 Feb 2002, 22:23 GMT
- RE: Re: on the necessity of god, goddess, gods, god desses, or a combinati on of the above,
Devine, James Fri 22 Feb 2002, 22:23 GMT
- Re: on the necessity of god, goddess, gods, goddesses, or a combination of the above,
Tom Walker Fri 22 Feb 2002, 21:19 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]