PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: : Premises, Circularities
Hey, I think this debate is great. I can delete the whole day's
posts without reading them and think of the time I save ;-).
Paul Phillips,
Economics,
University of Manitoba
> Doug wrote:
>
> > As is always the case with these debates,
> > I can't resist the urge to ask - so what?
> > Why is the value controversy so important?
> > Why is it so important for Justin to reject
> > it and Rakesh to defend it?
>
> This is highly correlated with the question I was asking to
> myself Doug: What is the purpose of this debate?
>
- Thread context:
- Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: : Premises, Circularities, (continued)
- Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: : Premises, Circularities,
Sabri Oncu Thu 07 Feb 2002, 21:24 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: : Premises, Circularities,
Justin Schwartz Thu 07 Feb 2002, 22:19 GMT
- RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: : Premises, Circularities,
Devine, James Thu 07 Feb 2002, 22:39 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]