Re: Re: LOV and LTV

[Rakesh Bhandari <rakeshb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> And how could Marx define the "absolute general law of capitalist
> accumulation" in the way he does in Ch XXV if his theory of value
> was not
> a) dynamic
> b )systemic?
>
>
>
> Mine is not an overimaginative reading of the overall thrust of
> Marx's approach, (although unimaginative readings of Marx's theory
> are more than possible).
>
>
> Chris Burford

Not at all Chris. I was suggesting that my definition was limited, in
need of supplmentation because it did not capture the meanings on
which you are rightly focused.

Rakesh