RE: Premises, Circularities etc was Re: His torical Materialism

["Devine, James" <jdevine@xxxxxxx>]

Martin, could you please explain these points in greater detail?

Martin Brown writes:
> Re geometry.  I think Goedel's paradox tends to refute your [Justin's??]
statement. ...<

which statement? and how does Goedel do so?

> Re physics.  I made an analogy in my earlier email.  Here is another F=ma
is subsumed by law of the conservation of energy. Physics problems that can
be solved with F=ma can all be solved much more generally and elegantly with
the Hamiltonian approach to conservation of energy, which is a much more
"macro" description of the problem.  In Marx, is the analogy the macro
conditions for the equivalence of economic aggregates.  <

by the last, do you mean the total value = total price and total
surplus-value = total profits+interest+rent conditions?

Jim Devine