Popperian falsification

["Davies, Daniel" <daniel.davies@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>Are you following Blaug to accept Popperian
>falsification, a criterion that makes _all_ social science (or almost all)
>worthless?

Not quite all  social science:  the social science of astrology makes twelve
falsifiable predictions every morning in my newspaper and thus qualifies as
a science on Popperian grounds.

http://www.adequacy.org/?op=displaystory;sid=2002/1/16/0333/18359

dd



___________________________________________________
Email Disclaimer

This communication is for the attention of the
named recipient only and should not be passed
on to any other person. Information relating to
any company or security, is for information
purposes only and should not be interpreted as
a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any security.
The information on which this communication is based
has been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable,
but we do not guarantee its accuracy or completeness.
All expressions of opinion are subject to change
without notice.  All e-mail messages, and associated attachments,
are subject to interception and monitoring for lawful business purposes.
___________________________________________________