PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: LOV and LTV
At 07/02/02 06:07 +0000, you wrote:
CB: In this sense, Marx's "value" is not heuristic, but a fundamental
theoretical concept.
I'm not persuaded.
jks
Nobody has to be persuaded of anything.
But Justin, do you accept that what you criticise as being redundant some
of us would merely call a labor theory of prices?
And from the perspective of it being an expanation of exploitation, some of
us would say that childen notice there are grossly unfair and inexplicable
differences in society. Some of us would say that the marxian theory of
value is much bigger than an explanation of exploitation.
Without being persuaded by us, do you acknowedge that such different
perspectives exist?
Chris Burford
- Thread context:
- Re: LOV and LTV, (continued)
- Re: LOV and LTV,
Justin Schwartz Thu 07 Feb 2002, 06:13 GMT
- Re: Re: LOV and LTV,
Justin Schwartz Thu 07 Feb 2002, 15:31 GMT
- LOV and LTV,
Charles Brown Thu 07 Feb 2002, 15:58 GMT
- LOV and LTV,
Charles Brown Thu 07 Feb 2002, 16:34 GMT
- Re: Re: LOV and LTV,
christian11 Thu 07 Feb 2002, 17:27 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]