Re: Re: Re: Re: Historical Materialism

["Justin Schwartz" <jkschw@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> The empirical equivalence thesis is part of Q-D, no? Wasn't meaning
> to suggest it was the whole shebang.

I don't think so. It's verificationist. Q-D is not. jks

> As we've all been remiss in pointing out until now, the most
> powerful critique of Capital -- in the last decade at the very
> least -- makes no use whatsoever of value theory. What is missing
> from that book............."Wall Street", that value theory would
> make substantive improvements on?

well, we have it from very wise people that you can't begin to understand or
explain capitalism without value theory, we're stucvk at the level of mere
ecletic phenomenal static description. Sorry, Doug.

jks

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.