RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: query: Historical Materialism

["Davies, Daniel" <daniel.davies@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>It's analytical Marxist. Most AMs, like me, do not believe that Marx's
>value
>theory is more than a heuristic, and think that the important and true
>insights in Marx can be stated without the labor theory of value.
>
>jks
>

Out of interest, what's wrong with the labour theory of value?  Do the AMs
have an alternative theory of value, or do you try to get along without one?
Feel free to not answer if it would take more labour than is worth bothering
with.

cheers

dd


___________________________________________________
Email Disclaimer

This communication is for the attention of the
named recipient only and should not be passed
on to any other person. Information relating to
any company or security, is for information
purposes only and should not be interpreted as
a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any security.
The information on which this communication is based
has been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable,
but we do not guarantee its accuracy or completeness.
All expressions of opinion are subject to change
without notice.  All e-mail messages, and associated attachments,
are subject to interception and monitoring for lawful business purposes.
___________________________________________________