BLS DAILY REPORT, MONDAY, JANUARY 28, 2002 NEW YORK (MONEY Magazine) - Over the past few years, employers fattened their benefit plans with an array of tasty treats, from pet insurance to stress-reducing lunchtime massages. This year, it's back to basics -- retirement, health care, stock options and insurance -- as compensation and benefits managers trim calories in response to the economic downturn and the mounting uncertainty of a nation at war. Personal retirement funds may be getting a heavy beating from the stock market and layoffs, but the value that employees place in their nest eggs hasn't diminished. Defined-benefit plans: Companies are moving away from traditional pensions (in which the payout is determined by a formula applied to final average earnings) in favor of less costly cash-balance plans and the increasingly popular 401(k) defined-contribution plans. (http://money.cnn.com/2002/01/24/companies/benefits_money) Younger workers who once expected to ride the wave from the economic surge are instead taking some of the biggest tumbles in the recession. The trend alarms economists because youth unemployment can hamper income and advancement later on. The jobless rate for those ages 20 to 24 hit 9.6% last month, while those 16 to 19 are seeing unemployment rates topping 16%, according to the Department of Labor. That's far above the national jobless rate of 5.8%. (http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2002-01-24-unemployment-young.htm, Page 1B) According to data compiled by BNA, the all-settlements weighted average first-year wage increase in agreements reported in 2001 was 4.2 percent, compared with 3.8 percent in 2000. The second- and third-year weighted average increases in agreements in 2001 were 3.7 percent and 3.8 percent respectively. (Daily Labor Report, page D-1) With the economy in particular decline in the Pacific Northwest, where Oregon and Washington have the two highest unemployment rates in the nation, hundreds of immigrant laborers have left agricultural area on the eastern side of the Cascade Mountains in recent months, looking for work in the urban areas on the western side. However, the market for such unskilled work is drying up. (The New York Times, Sunday , January 27, section 1, page 18) A study released last week by the Economic Policy Institute in Washington argues that a stronger recovery than is currently forecast by most economists will be needed to prevent unemployment from continuing to rise this year. The unemployment rate was 5.8 percent in December up from a low of 3.9 percent in October 2000. The institute's study predicts that even with the economy recovering, unemployment will continue to rise, reaching 6.5 percent by the fall, and hovering in the 6 percent range next year. (The New York Times, page A21) DUE OUT TUESDAY: Mass Layoffs in December
<<application/ms-tnef>>
- FW: [SLDRTY-L]: going to the WEF? Here is some web pages!, michael pugliese Tue 29 Jan 2002, 00:00 GMT
- RE: Re: he profit rate & recession, Devine, James Mon 28 Jan 2002, 20:50 GMT
- Re: RE: Re: he profit rate & recession, Rakesh Bhandari Mon 28 Jan 2002, 21:49 GMT
- Re: RE: Re: he profit rate & recession, Michael Perelman Tue 29 Jan 2002, 02:09 GMT
- BLS Daly Report, Richardson_D Mon 28 Jan 2002, 20:43 GMT
- Fwd: Good analysis, Mohammad Maljoo Mon 28 Jan 2002, 20:26 GMT
- [Fwd: Arbitrary Objects], ravi Mon 28 Jan 2002, 18:40 GMT
- The rate of profit and recession, Charles Brown Mon 28 Jan 2002, 17:48 GMT
- Re: The rate of profit and recession, Paul Phillips Mon 28 Jan 2002, 18:58 GMT