RE: Re: RE: Re: the profit rate & recession

To: "'pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: the profit rate & recession
From: "Devine, James" <jdevine@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 12:23:09 -0800

my guess: both.

> Was it uncompetitive capital-labor ratio costs or the overvalued
> dollar or both that transformed the US steel industry?
>
> Ian
>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: the profit rate & recession
  - From: Ian Murray

Prev by Date: Fwd: Good analysis
Next by Date: RE: Re: RE: the profit rate & recession
Previous by thread: the profit rate & recession
Next by thread: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: the profit rate & recession
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- RE: Re: the profit rate & recession, (continued)
  - RE: Re: the profit rate & recession, Devine, James Mon 28 Jan 2002, 17:44 GMT
    - Re: he profit rate & recession, Michael Perelman Mon 28 Jan 2002, 17:50 GMT
    - Re: RE: Re: the profit rate & recession, Ian Murray Mon 28 Jan 2002, 17:53 GMT
  - the profit rate & recession, Charles Brown Mon 28 Jan 2002, 18:01 GMT
  - RE: Re: RE: Re: the profit rate & recession, Devine, James Mon 28 Jan 2002, 20:27 GMT
    - Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: the profit rate & recession, Ian Murray Tue 29 Jan 2002, 00:42 GMT
  - RE: Re: RE: the profit rate & recession, Devine, James Mon 28 Jan 2002, 20:41 GMT
    - Re: RE: Re: RE: the profit rate & recession, Doug Henwood Mon 28 Jan 2002, 20:48 GMT
  - RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: the profit rate & recession, Devine, James Mon 28 Jan 2002, 22:01 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]